Posts

NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 248(1), 252(1)(3), 455 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SECTION 144, 147, 271(1)(B), 271(1)(C) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961

Image
          NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(1) Vs. Registrar Of Companies And Ors, (2020) 07 NCLT CK 0058 NCLT allowed the application filed by the applicant, under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the name of the struck off company. While allowing the application NCLT held that the Income Tax Department is an aggrieved party within the meaning of section 252(1)(3) as it has to recover taxes payable by respondent company and great prejudice will be caused to the Appellant if the name of the respondent company is not restored back. In the above circumstances, this appeal is allowed. The Registrar of companie...